Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

90 Ohio St. 3d 310; 737 N.E.2d 1284

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith (Ohio 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years and stay eighteen months of the suspension, with the stay conditioned on respondent’s cooperation with the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program and on respondent’s working with a monitor, to be appointed by relator. Failure to satisfy these conditions will result in the reinstatement of respondent’s stayed suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.