Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Battisti

Ohio Supreme Court December 27, 2000

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Battisti, 90 Ohio St. 3d 452 (Ohio 2000)

739 N.E.2d 344

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusion that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and 7-102(A)(5). We do not conclude that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4). Our review of the stipulated facts also indicates that respondent’s infraction was an isolated incident. We adopt the recommendation of the board and respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Columbus Bar Association v. Battisti
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published