Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Battisti

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 27, 2000 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

90 Ohio St. 3d 452; 739 N.E.2d 344

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Battisti (Ohio 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusion that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and 7-102(A)(5). We do not conclude that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4). Our review of the stipulated facts also indicates that respondent’s infraction was an isolated incident. We adopt the recommendation of the board and respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.