Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White

State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 1, 2000 · Cooperate, Dates, Deny, Discovery, Douglas, Motion, Parties, Stratton, Urges
90 Ohio St. 3d 1401; 734 N.E.2d 833; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2163

State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for protective order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for protective order be, and hereby is, denied as moot.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but urges the parties to cooperate to determine mutually acceptable expedited dates for discovery. Douglas, J., votes to deny the motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑