State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court October 24, 2000

State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1446 (Ohio 2000)

737 N.E.2d 51; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2692

Based, Cook, Deny, Douglas, Laches, Motee, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied.

Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would deny the writ based on laches.

Reference

Status: Published