Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections

State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 24, 2000 · Based, Cook, Deny, Douglas, Laches, Motee, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
90 Ohio St. 3d 1446; 737 N.E.2d 51; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2692

State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied.

Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., would deny the writ based on laches.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑