Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

Hubin v. Hubin

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 2000 · Sweeney

90 Ohio St. 3d 1482; 738 N.E.2d 1255; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3062

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Warzala v. Warzala, 2006-T-0018 (6-8-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Tonti v. Tonti, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Musselman v. Musselman, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed October 19, 2000:

“When determining the proper amount of child support in a shared parenting case, must a court presume that each parent must pay his or her child support obligation on line twenty-four of the child support worksheet and then order the difference through an offset while reserving the ability to deviate?”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 00-1406, Hubin v. Hubin, Franklin App. No. 99AP-1156.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents to all of the above.

The conflict cases are Weinberger v. Weinberger (May 15, 1998), Hamilton App. No. C-970552, unreported, 1998 WL 241790; Congdon v. Congdon (Nov. 13, 1998), Hamilton App. No. C-971002, unreported, 1998 WL 789144; Luke v. Luke (Feb. 20, 1998), Lake App. No. 97-L-044, unreported, 1998 WL 172813; Anthony v. Anthony (Dec. 3, 1999), Lake App. No. 98-L-222, unreported, 1999 WL *14831313730; French v. Burkhart (May 22, 2000), Delaware App. No. 99CAF07038, unreported, 2000 WL 699656; and Beard v. Beard (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 102, 719 N.E.2d 625.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.