State ex rel. Williams-Bey v. Taft

Ohio Supreme Court December 20, 2000

State ex rel. Williams-Bey v. Taft, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 2000)

739 N.E.2d 815; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3145

Cook, Determination, Documentation, Douglas, Evid, Falsity, Grant, Lack, Motion, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On motion to dismiss, motion for the determination of material falsity, motion to substitute relator David Turner, motion to strike motion to dismiss and motion for determination of material falsity, and motion for appointment of counsel. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. All other motions are denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs in the denial of the motion for determination of material falsity for lack of authenticated supporting documentation. See Evid.R. 901. Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur' except that they would grant the motion for determination of material falsity.

Reference

Status: Published