Ohio Supreme Court, 2000

State ex rel. Williams-Bey v. Taft

State ex rel. Williams-Bey v. Taft
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 20, 2000 · Cook, Determination, Documentation, Douglas, Evid, Falsity, Grant, Lack, Motion, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
90 Ohio St. 3d 1489; 739 N.E.2d 815; 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3145

State ex rel. Williams-Bey v. Taft

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On motion to dismiss, motion for the determination of material falsity, motion to substitute relator David Turner, motion to strike motion to dismiss and motion for determination of material falsity, and motion for appointment of counsel. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. All other motions are denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs in the denial of the motion for determination of material falsity for lack of authenticated supporting documentation. See Evid.R. 901. Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur' except that they would grant the motion for determination of material falsity.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.