State ex rel. Pheils v. Pietrykowski
Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Pheils v. Pietrykowski, 2001 Ohio 1891 (Ohio 2001)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1232
State ex rel. Pheils v. Pietrykowski
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at93 Ohio St.3d 1232
.]
THE STATE EX REL. PHEILS v. PIETRYKOWSKI, JUDGE, ET AL.
[Cite as State ex rel. Pheils v. Pietrykowski, 2001-Ohio-1891.]
Prohibition—Motion for reconsideration of court’s decision granting writ—Motion
granted—Opinion vacated and cause dismissed.
(No. 01-713—Submitted October 30, 2001—Decided December 19, 2001.)
IN PROHIBITION.
ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
__________________
{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted.
{¶ 2} The judgment in State ex rel. Pheils v. Pietrykowski (2001), 93 Ohio
St.3d 460,755 N.E.2d 893
, decided October 17, 2001, is vacated, and this cause is
dismissed.
DOUGLAS, ACTING C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and Lundberg
Stratton, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, J., not participating.
__________________
Pheils & Wisniewski and David R. Pheils, Jr., pro se.
Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and John A. Borell,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondents.
__________________
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Prohibition—Motion for reconsideration of court's decision granting writ—Motion granted—Opinion vacated and cause dismissed.