[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                   OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CARSON.
            [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson, 

.]
             (No. 01-384—Submitted and decided December 10, 2001.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent Edward Luke Carson, Attorney 

 last known business address in Girard, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 15, 2001, wherein the
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years
with one year stayed and credit for time he had not practiced since May 8, 2000, finds
that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of
Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Edward Luke Carson be and hereby is
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of
publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson (2001), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________