[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                   OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ALLEN.
             [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen, 

.]
            (No. 00-1549—Submitted and decided December 10, 2001.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent Craig A. Allen, a.k.a. Craig Adams
Allen, Attorney 

 last known address in Ironton, Ohio.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of January 17, 2001,
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a
period of eighteen months, with nine months stayed, finds that respondent has
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R.
V(10)(A). Therefore,
        {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Craig A. Allen, a.k.a. Craig
Adams Allen, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent
bear the costs of publication.
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen (2001), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________