State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 1595 (Ohio 2001)
93 Ohio St. 3d 1218

State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 1218.]

THE STATE EX REL. YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1595.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-300—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1255. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Armbrust, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Buckinghanm, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., and Richard A. Hernandez, for appellee Freight Sales, Inc. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.