State ex rel. Taneff v. Columbus
State ex rel. Taneff v. Columbus
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 500.]
THE STATE EX REL. TANEFF, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Taneff v. Columbus, 2001-Ohio-1601.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-684—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-782. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Janet Jackson, City Attorney, and Michael C. Matuska, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee city of Columbus. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Daniel M. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.