State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.
State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 501.]
THE STATE EX REL. MAYS, APPELLANT, v. MIAMI VALLEY MASONRY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc., 2001-Ohio-1602.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-690—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-672. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.