State v. Wozniak
State v. Wozniak
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 173.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WOZNIAK, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wozniak, 2001-Ohio-1307.] Criminal law—Sexual predators—R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate the separation of powers doctrine—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Thompson. (Nos. 00-2014 and 00-2157—Submitted January 9, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-349. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 584, 752 N.E.2d 276. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah W. Thompson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David L. Strait, Franklin County Public Defender, for appellant. __________________
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Criminal law—Sexual predators—R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate the separation of powers doctrine—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Thompson.