State v. Wozniak

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Wozniak, 2001 Ohio 1307 (Ohio 2001)
93 Ohio St. 3d 173

State v. Wozniak

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 173.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WOZNIAK, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wozniak, 2001-Ohio-1307.] Criminal law—Sexual predators—R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate the separation of powers doctrine—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Thompson. (Nos. 00-2014 and 00-2157—Submitted January 9, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-349. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 584, 752 N.E.2d 276. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah W. Thompson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David L. Strait, Franklin County Public Defender, for appellant. __________________

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Criminal law—Sexual predators—R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate the separation of powers doctrine—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Thompson.