In re Walker
In re Walker
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 211.]
IN RE WALKER. [Cite as In re Walker, 2001-Ohio-1327.] Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re Anderson. (No. 01-445—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1536, 747 N.E.2d 833, is granted. {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals' judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re Anderson.