Yoh v. Schlachter
Yoh v. Schlachter
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 234.]
YOH, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. SCHLACHTER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Yoh v. Schlachter, 2001-Ohio-183.] Workers’ compensation—Subrogation right of statutory subrogee against third party—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings on authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (No. 00-824—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided July 11, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Williams County, No. WM-99-008. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 748 N.E.2d 1111. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions of Chief Justice Moyer and Justice Cook in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 135-142, 748 N.E.2d 1111, 1128-1135. __________________ Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, L.L.P., and Jack G. Fynes, for appellant. Millisor & Nobil Co., L.P.A., Michael J. Reidy and Jill C. Boland, for appellee. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Subrogation right of statutory subrogee against third party—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings on authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.