[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 574.]

THE STATE EX REL. MEAD CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; HARRIS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-121.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-2190—Submitted April 24, 2001—Decided June 6, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1434. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ DOUGLAS, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Thompson & Hine, L.L.P., and Robert W. Myers, for appellee. Livorno & Arnett Co., L.P.A., and John F. Livorno, for appellant. __________________