State ex rel. Knauff v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Knauff v. Conrad, 2001 Ohio 115 (Ohio 2001)
91 Ohio St. 3d 569

State ex rel. Knauff v. Conrad

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 569.]

THE STATE EX REL. KNAUFF, APPELLANT, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Knauff v. Conrad, 2001-Ohio-115.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1692—Submitted April 24, 2001—Decided June 6, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1164. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Urbane Co., L.P.A., and Anthony P. Christine, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Warren & Young, P.L.L., Carl F. Muller and Katherine S. Riedel, for appellee Andover Industries, d.b.a. Buffalo Molded Plastics, Inc. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.