State v. Garretson
State v. Garretson
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1267.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. GARRETSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Garretson, 2001-Ohio-94.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed because the issue is now moot. (No. 00-1462—Submitted April 3, 2001—Decided May 23, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA99-10-123. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed because the issue is now moot. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss the cause as moot. Rather, I would find that pursuant to R.C. 2949.05, the trial court had jurisdiction to execute its sentence. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court. __________________ Timothy A. Oliver, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kenneth A. Ewing, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. James N. Perry, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Jonathan R. Fulkerson, Assistant Attorney General, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Attorney General of Ohio. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed because the issue is now moot.