[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 378.]

THE STATE EX REL. KING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. King v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-43.]

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1212—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-605. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ McCrory & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Kurt M. Young, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Bugbee & Conkle and Richard L. Johnson, for appellee Toledo Stamping & Manufacturing Company. __________________