State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 379.]
THE STATE EX REL. ASARCO, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS- APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Asarco, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-68.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and Industrial Commission’s order reinstated. (No. 00-1252—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.)
APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1247. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, CO., L.P.A., and Patrick A. Devine, for appellee and cross-appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant and cross-appellee Kenneth A. Poland. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.