Overton v. W. Res. Group
Overton v. W. Res. Group
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 333.]
OVERTON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. WESTERN RESERVE GROUP, APPELLEE. [Cite as Overton v. W. Res. Group, 2001-Ohio-62.] Insurance—Homeowner’s insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 00-277—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided April 11, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wayne County, No. 99CA0007. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Boyk, McCulley & Crossmock and Steven L. Crossmock; and David G. Lake, for appellants. __________________
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Insurance—Homeowner's insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.