Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court
Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co., 2001 Ohio 65 (Ohio 2001)
91 Ohio St. 3d 334

Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co.

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 334.]

DICKE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Dicke v. Safeco Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-65.] Insurance—Homeowner’s insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 01-343—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided April 11, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-2000-64. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Gooding, Huffman, Kelley & Becker, L.L.C., T. Blain Brook II and Lawrence A. Huffman, for appellants. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Insurance—Homeowner's insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.