Witten v. Richmond Hts.
Witten v. Richmond Hts.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 204.]
WITTEN, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Witten v. Richmond Hts., 2001-Ohio-280.]
Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C.
2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (No. 00-917—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 77728. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, ___ N.E.2d ___.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Lester S. Potash, for appellee.
R. Todd Hunt, Director of Law; Walter & Haverfield, P.L.L., Jonathan D.
Greenberg and Barbara R. Marburger, for appellants. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.