State ex rel. Ramsey v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Ramsey v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 24.]
THE STATE EX REL. RAMSEY, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Ramsey v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-23.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-858—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 24, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-733. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________
COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} Based on the rationale set forth in the decision of the court of appeals’ magistrate, I respectfully dissent. __________________ Butler, Cincione, DiCuccio & Barnhart and David B. Barnhart, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.