Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad
Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1248.]
ESTATE OF LIPOSCHAK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CONRAD, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Estate of Liposchak v. Conrad, 2001-Ohio-17.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-839—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Jefferson County, No. 98-JE-26. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and Eric S. Bravo, for appellants.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.