Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

State ex rel. Cultice v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Cultice v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 6, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
91 Ohio St. 3d 572; 747 N.E.2d 821; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1523

State ex rel. Cultice v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant appellant relief in accordance with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑