Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 6, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Resnigk, Stratton, Sweeney

91 Ohio St. 3d 574; 747 N.E.2d 822; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1519

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnigk and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.