Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 91 Ohio St. 3d 574 (Ohio 2001)
747 N.E.2d 822; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1519
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Resnigk, Stratton, Sweeney

State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnigk and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State ex rel. Mead Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio Harris
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
↑