Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Lonas v. Kail

Lonas v. Kail
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 31, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
91 Ohio St. 3d 1201; 740 N.E.2d 1103

Lonas v. Kail

Opinion of the Court

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent and would, instead, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.