Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 27, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Reapply, Resnick, Respondent, Stratton, Sweeney, Than

91 Ohio St. 3d 1248; 745 N.E.2d 1043

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Muhlbach (Ohio 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On September 19, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of probation, and on March 5, 2001, he filed a notice of compliance. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order dated September 23, 1998, and its order dated February 15, 2001.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, P. Michael Muhlbach, a.k.a. Peter Michael Muhlbach, Attorney Registration No. 0058412, last known address in Parma, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 224, 699 N.E.2d 459; and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 547, 715 N.E.2d 1134.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would permit respondent to reapply no earlier than September 15, 2001.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.