Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

State v. Garretson

State v. Garretson
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 23, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
91 Ohio St. 3d 1267
State v. Garretson

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed because the issue is now moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss the cause as moot. Rather, I would find that pursuant to R.C. 2949.05, the trial court had jurisdiction to execute its sentence. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.