Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 17, 2001 · Cook, Moyer, Stratton
91 Ohio St. 3d 1411; 740 N.E.2d 1111; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 85
Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hamilton App. Nos. C-990729, C-990814 and C-990815. On discretionary appeal. Appeal allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hoc vice of James P. Dorr and Sarah L. Olson by Robert A. McMahon.

Motion granted.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of Harold Mayberry and Lawrence Greenwald et al. by Robert A. McMahon. Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.