Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

State ex rel. Ormond v. Solon

State ex rel. Ormond v. Solon
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 14, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
91 Ohio St. 3d 1444; 742 N.E.2d 143; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 371

State ex rel. Ormond v. Solon

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. On motion for leave to intervene as respondents by Cameratta Properties, L.P., and DiSanto Enterprises, Inc. Motion granted.

On motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment, answer of respondent, motion to strike affidavit in support of complaint, motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment by Cameratta Properties, L.P. et ah, motion to set response date to intervenor’s motion to dismiss if leave is granted, and motion to expedite review of complaint in mandamus. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.