State v. Weideman
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Logan (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- State v. Orihel, Unpublished Decision (1-28-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- Natl. City Bank v. Victor Bldg. Co. (Ohio 2001)
- State v. Nutt (Ohio 2001)
- State v. Mitts (Ohio 2003)
- Swingle v. Money (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2002)
- State, City of Nelsonville v. Woodrum, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State v. Clary (Ohio 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Portage App. No. 98-P-0109. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed
“Whether a stop and detention of a motorist by a police officer, who is beyond his or her jurisdictional limits, for an offense observed and committed outside the officer’s jurisdiction automatically constitutes a per se unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, thereby triggering the mandatory application of the exclusionary rule to suppress all evidence flowing from the stop.”
Cause consolidated with 00-2126, State v. Weideman, Portage App. No. 98-P-0109.
The conflict cases are State v. Filler (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 731, 667 N.E.2d 54; State v. Tennison (Apr. 14, 1989), Wood App. No. WD-88-41, unreported, 1989 WL 35534; State v. Brown (Apr. 16, 1999), Pickaway App. No. 98CA27, unreported, 1999 WL 259649; and State v. Hammons (Aug. 28, 1998), Montgomery App. No. 16931, unreported, 1998 WL 543363.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.