Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 2, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
91 Ohio St. 3d 1479; 744 N.E.2d 1193; 2001 Ohio LEXIS 921

State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondent’s answer and on determination pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any new cases from Lonny Lee Bristow without the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑