Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 5, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
92 Ohio St. 3d 212; 749 N.E.2d 291

Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑