Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 92 Ohio St. 3d 212 (Ohio 2001)
749 N.E.2d 291
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑