Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 5, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
92 Ohio St. 3d 214; 749 N.E.2d 292

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Bruce S. Rutsky and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Eugene G. Gillis and Daniel D. Domozick, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.