Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 5, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

92 Ohio St. 3d 214; 749 N.E.2d 292

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Cordle v. Jackson, Unpublished Decision (1-18-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
Heilman v. Progressive Ins. Co. (Ohio 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Bruce S. Rutsky and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Eugene G. Gillis and Daniel D. Domozick, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.