Ohio Supreme Court, 2001

Post v. Harber

Post v. Harber
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 8, 2001 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
92 Ohio St. 3d 434; 751 N.E.2d 479

Post v. Harber

Opinion of the Court

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs in judgment only. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A, and Todd 0. Rosenberg, for appellants. Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Steven G. LaForge and Barbara Kozar Letcher, for appellee Ohio Farmers Insurance Company. Mann & Preston, L.L.P., and Mark A Preston, for appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.