State ex rel. Long v. Council of the Village of Cardington
State ex rel. Long v. Council of the Village of Cardington
Opinion of the Court
On relator’s application for attorney fees and costs and relator’s submission of evidence in support of application, relator is awarded $17,623.75 in attorney fees and a refund of $140 in costs (security deposit and docket fees). Relator’s request for additional attorney fees is denied.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I did not agree with the majority’s decision to grant a writ of mandamus because I believed that the relator had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law under R.C. 121.22(I)(1). See State ex rel. Long v. Cardington Village Council (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 54, 61-63, 748 N.E.2d 58, 65-67 (Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting). Consequently, I do not agree that she is entitled to recover her costs and attorney fees. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State ex rel. Long v. Council of the Village of Cardington
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published