Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.
Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co.
Opinion
[Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.]
PEEBLES, EXR., APPELLANT, v. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Peebles v. Owners Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2002-Ohio-7022.] Insurance — Motor vehicles — Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage — Homeowner’s insurance policy — Residence-employee exception — Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 2002-0788 — Submitted December 4, 2002 — Decided December 23, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Fulton County, No. F-01-022, 2002-Ohio- 1518. __________________ {¶1} Although this cause was accepted for review and held for the decision in Lemm v. The Hartford, submitted with Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 97 Ohio St.3d 411, 2002-Ohio-6662, 780 N.E.2d 262, Lemm does not apply. This cause is therefore dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Boss & Vitou Co., L.P.A., and Mark F. Vitou, for appellant. Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Bahret, for appellee. __________________
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Insurance - Motor vehicles - Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage - Homeowner's insurance policy - Residence-employee exception - Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.