State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc., 2002 Ohio 5785 (Ohio 2002)
97 Ohio St. 3d 181

State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 181.]

THE STATE EX REL. UNTHANK, APPELLANT, v. HOLLAND MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc., 2002-Ohio- 5785.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2001-1459—Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1251. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., dissents, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. __________________ Clements, Mahin & Cohen, L.L.P., and Lane N. Cohen, for appellant. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., and Corey V. Crognale, for appellee Holland Motor Express, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. __________________

1

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.