State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.
State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 181.]
THE STATE EX REL. UNTHANK, APPELLANT, v. HOLLAND MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc., 2002-Ohio- 5785.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2001-1459—Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1251. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., dissents, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. __________________ Clements, Mahin & Cohen, L.L.P., and Lane N. Cohen, for appellant. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., and Corey V. Crognale, for appellee Holland Motor Express, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. __________________
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.