Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.
Tallal v. Bank One, N.A.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1251.]
TALLAL, A.K.A. TURNER, APPELLANT, v. BANK ONE, N.A., APPELLEE. [Cite as Tallal v. Bank One, N.A., 2002-Ohio-1489.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 01-512—Submitted February 27, 2002—Decided April 3, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 19592. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, HANDWORK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
PETER M. HANDWORK, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for COOK, J. __________________ Blakemore, Meeker & Bowler Co., L.P.A., Robert C. Meeker and Darren W. DeHaven, for appellant.
Zeiger & Carpenter, Marion H. Little, Jr., John W. Zeiger and Eva C.
Gildee, for appellee. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.