Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace
Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1249.]
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 2002-Ohio-1370.] (No. 99-1866—Submitted October 3, 2001—Decided March 6, 2002.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Paul Wallace, a.k.a. Paul Lawrence Wallace, Attorney Registration No. 0010369, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 31, 2000, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Paul Wallace, a.k.a. Paul Lawrence Wallace, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For other cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 113, 729 N.E.2d 343; Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1434, 741 N.E.2d 896; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 414, 763 N.E.2d 1154, decided today. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
1 COOK, J., dissents. __________________
2
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Attorneys at law—On application for reinstatement—Gov.Bar R. V(5)(B)(3)—Respondent reinstated.