[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1240.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. KATHMAN. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman, 2002-Ohio-1050.] (No. 00-1865—Submitted and decided February 19, 2002.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward T. Kathman, Attorney Registration No. 0055446, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 13, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Edward T. Kathman be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 92, 748 N.E.2d 1091.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________