State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court January 9, 2002

State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38 (Ohio 2002)

759 N.E.2d 1255

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Lonas, McGonegal & Tsangeos and Terrance J. McGonegal, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Roetzel & Andress, Douglas E. Spiker and Noel C. Shepard, for appellee Handy & Harmon Automotive Group, Inc. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant relator the requested relief in accordance with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Status: Published