Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 9, 2002 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
94 Ohio St. 3d 38; 759 N.E.2d 1255

State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Lonas, McGonegal & Tsangeos and Terrance J. McGonegal, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Roetzel & Andress, Douglas E. Spiker and Noel C. Shepard, for appellee Handy & Harmon Automotive Group, Inc. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant relator the requested relief in accordance with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.