Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kathman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 2002 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

94 Ohio St. 3d 1240; 763 N.E.2d 607

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman (Ohio 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward T. Kathman, Attorney Registration No. 0055446, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 13, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

*1241IT IS ORDERED by this court that Edward T. Kathman be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 92, 748 N.E.2d 1091.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.