State v. Lomax

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Lomax, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2002)
761 N.E.2d 1054; 2002 Ohio LEXIS 271
Counsel, Douglas, Moyer, Resnick, Stratton

State v. Lomax

Opinion of the Court

Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County. Upon consideration of the motion for recusal of the Sandusky County Prosecutor’s Office,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for recusal be, and hereby is, granted.

Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent'. Resnick, J., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled in this case for January 29, 2002, be postponed until further order of the court.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Reference

Status
Published